Would It Truly Be Noble to Just Say No?

Well I read with much delight Eugene Robinson's article in a recent Washington Post offering. Who exactly pays this man's salary?

In his column He asks for ... somebody to explain this to me. What this is, is the issue of Barack Obama receiving an award. He was irritated that a few persons of character would denounce Obama for accepting the Nobel Peace Prize. He acts rather jocose when he states that the award may be the world's most prestigious award. Now I wish I had a bird in a cage because his article would surely be adorning its bottom level, with the bird having literally free run of the entire area as it saw fit.

Prestigious you say Eugene? Let's look at this award that according to Robinson is the cat's meow around worldly circles. In 2007, Al Gore received a portion of the award for among other things his orchestrating of an economic upturn for many. Those that have profited handsomely for the on-going perpetrating of the global warming hoax think he was a good choice. The misguided Hollywood elite (the bastions of immorality) that gave Gore an award for his Inconvenient Truth (aka The Inconvenient Lie) were just giddy and elated at his winning the PRESTIGIOUS Nobel Peace Prize. Recently a court has brought the curtain down on Gore's ever-increasing waistline by indicating that his movie had NINE fatal flaws, aka mistruths, aka LIES,

Another great selection in recent times was in 2001, when Kofi Annan (aka let's see how much money I can get for my brother and my family Annan) received it. The awards committee alleged that he received it for his work for a better organized and more peaceful world. Really! Well let's look at the facts. During his tenure at the helm of the impotent United Nations he refused to meaningfully confront mass genocide in Sudan, Rwanda, and Bosnia. He got down on all fours while allowing the departed, hanged Saddamn Hussein regime to run amok. Global terrorism picked up during his tenure of world peacekeeping. In the Congo (a neighbor of his beloved homeland Ghana) he was the captain of the ship that allowed (by inaction) U.N personnel certain human rights violations against the poor and down trodden refugees. The coup de gras was his leadership or lack thereof in dealing with the scandal that emanated from the food for oil program. Annan's feathers weren't the least bit ruffled by the multi-million dollar scandal when his organization was presented a scathing briefing by Charles Duelfer (the weapons of mass destruction inspector). Duelfer who wrote that Annan's handpicked appointee Benji Saavan, who oversaw the oil for food program allegedly received a payment voucher from Saddam Hussein himself, to the tune of 13 million (with an M) barrels of oil. Hmmm! How many Hummers does Saavan own? That's a ubiquitous amount of oil. I'd say someone has a lot of SPLAINING TO DO LUCY!

In 1994, Yasser " keep the little boys away from him" Arafat received 1/3 of the Nobel Peace Prize. I love that don't you... the prestigious award is oftentimes cut into threes or halves. This man was at the bottom of an on-going terrorist operation while at the helm of the PLO.

Let's see if these Scandinavians can get the courage to consider Kim Jong il a 1/3 portion of the PRESTIGIOUS award in the future. But let's not forget the rather disheveled Iranian Akmadenijan, he is someone who would add prestige to this worldwide award.

Now we have Barack Hussein Obama... Robinson quipped that conservatives hate America. Really? I think Eugene fell off his hobby horse again. Robinson, conservatives hate socialism. They hate Communists. They hate people who are dressed in sheep's clothing but are actually evil destructive forces that want to weaken our great country.

Now Eugene it is preposterous that an award would be given to someone who has as his resume a speech given in West Berlin (that was broadcast to the world). Sorry Eugene, it is a travesty, it is a farce. Obama even uttered that he didn't deserve it!!! You're on the Titanic Robinson listening to the band.

Further, in Robinson's column he writes that even if Obama ended all hunger in the world that his critics would accuse him of promoting obesity. He further writes that if Obama solved global warming that his detractors would claim it was getting chilly. Well Robinson, it really is getting chillier than it is getting warmer. Since 1992 as a matter of fact. But I've never wanted to confuse you with the facts.

Robinson's rather rude observation that the Taliban and Republican leaders are joined in some nexus regarding this award going to Obama is quite absurd. The slogan " I'm With The Taliban Against America" is somehow been juxtapositioned as meaningful dialogue? Republicans above all else would like to see the Taliban blown back into the 3rd century.

Once more I fear that Robinson needs to extract his head from the kitty litter sandbox. He is rather engaged in Obama's new leadership and direction, even opining that his policy will more likely succeed in a multipolar world (whatever the hell that means). Multipolar? Hmm. Are the polar bears really becoming extinct? Well they're numbers are increasing Mr. Gore! So are the caribou in Alaska!

Ok, let's get to the crux here. Robinson alleges (rather foolishly) that the award is nothing more than an acknowledgement of what Obama has been saying and doing thus far. But Eugene, nominations for this PRESTIGIOUS AWARD ended in the first days of February. To date, Obama has nothing to show for his barnstorming globe-trotting tour, that had at its cornerstone
the continued criticism of the greatest nation on the planet Earth.

Obama, according to Robinson has taken on the rescue of the U.S. financial system and the long-term restructuring of the economy. Really! Is this relevant to world peace? Wasn't this done after the close of nominations to the elite Nobel Peace Prize committee? Would you say that going from approximately a 545 billion dollar embarrassment to well over a 2 trillion dollar indiscretion meets the standard of rescuing the economy? Would you say Mr. Robinson that 10% unemployment rates generally do not forebode well for a government that is short of revenue? Trying to gag 83% of Americans that want to keep their existing health care as it is with minor adjustments would send the deficit to well over 3 trillion dollars. I write this in deference to your claim Mr. President that not one dime of increase will transpire. Rescuing our economy indeed Mr. President. Indeed Mr. Robinson. (Say is Mrs. Robinson still seeing that young man Dustin Hoffman)? Where's Joe Dimmagio when we need him, for after all a nation is turning it's lonely eyes to you for help!

Where's that bird cage and canary when I need it? Speaking of canaries... I think we Americans are sometimes looked upon by our misguided spendthrift Congress as frail little birds lowered in the bowels of the mine shaft.

In his campaign (which has never ended) Obama wants to be remembered as a transformational president. Well Mr. President, I can respectfully point out that you are well on your way to achieving bliss. After all your socialistic programs have started to unfold. Many of your appointments have proven to be incompetent tax-dodging cheats, Communistic loving ideologues, blithering babbling idiots, corrupt America hating left-wing lapdogs, and a general overall theme of being NON-TRANSPARENT.

The American public is onto your healing process Mr. President. YOUR change is not what we want.

Now is it a nobler act to say thanks, but no thanks?